Alec Collett

Tests carried out on human remains excavated in Lebanon this week could signal an end to a 25-year search for kidnapped Briton Alec Collett.

In March 1985, the freelance journalist was travelling through the streets of Beirut when he was snatched at gunpoint.

Palestinian militants stopped the car at a roadblock close to the city’s airport and pulled out him and his driver.

The driver, an Austrian national, was released shortly after but almost 25 years on, Alec Collett remains missing.

The married 64-year-old was in the country to visit Palestinian refugee camps for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency.

During the three-month assignment, he was expected to pass information to the international media on potentially major stories.

It was not the first job he had done for the UN.

The previous year he had worked on a similar assignment in the Middle East, and before that he spent three years in Ghana as director of the UN information centre in the capital, Accra.

He also worked at the UN bureau of the Associated Press and wrote for the Times of Zambia and the Botswana Guardian.

‘Proper burial’

British-born Mr Collett was living in New York with his American wife Elaine and their 11-year-old son, Karim, at the time of his disappearance.

It is understood he also had two adult children from his first marriage.

In an interview in 2005, Elaine Collett told the UK’s Times newspaper: “I want Alec’s remains recovered so we can give him a proper burial. All of us would like that.”

Alec Collett was the first UN employee to be kidnapped in Lebanon.

The organisation tried three times between 1995 and 2000 to find his body and there have been numerous false alarms.

In 1986, on the day that TV journalist John McCarthy was kidnapped on the way to Beirut airport, there were news reports that three bodies had been found in the city – one of whom was believed to be Mr Collett.

Retaliation

But a day later, the third body was identified as an American, Peter Kilburn.

That same year, a militant Palestinian group – the Abu Nidal organisation – claimed to have killed him in retaliation for US air raids on Libya.

A video showing the hanging of a hooded figure said to be Mr Collett was released, but the victim was never officially identified.

This latest search by a British team of military and intelligence specialists is reportedly the result of a tip-off.

DNA tests are being carried out to determine whether the remains are those of Mr Collett.

In 1986, the United Nations Correspondents’ Association, an organisation for journalists based around the world, made him their honorary president, a title he has retained ever since.

And every year UN staff remember him during a day of solidarity for missing humanitarian workers at the organisation’s headquarters in New York.




3 Comments. Add your own...

  • 1. JOEY ZAZA | November 19th, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    poor man, sorry to see incent poeple come to lebanon and have to pay the price of death….

  • 2. PIERRE | November 19th, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    What happened to the other body discovered with him? how come they just re-burried it? What a shame!

  • 3. May | November 20th, 2009 at 5:31 am

    Unfortunately many of the readers of this blog were not old enough to remember those years of kidnapping foreign journalists (Jean-Paul Kaufman), researchers (Michel Seurat) and others. Google their names and read about that terror period in Beirut. Unfortunately, this is what Westerners remember of Beirut and Lebanon in general. Many were perpetrators, mainly what was called Jama3a Islamiyah and, were nothing else then HA today. They refurbished their name, brandished themselves as patriotic, noble, proclaimed themselves the only defendant against Israel after making sure they liquidate the communist party leadership, eliminated rivalry by fighting a bitter war with their fellow shiites. Imad Moughaniyeh who was thought to be the mastermind met his creator. Who would want to go and live in Iraq now? In 10 years?
    Of course there are some who might argue that terror was a powerful weapon against powerful enemies (USA, France, etc..). Or that wartime rules of conduct are different from times of peace… The present does not erase the past.



Leave a Reply


Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed