« LF Rome Letter
Lebanese Politicians on vacation »

Pierre Dakach and the neutrality lie.

Posted by Richy

We all easily remember the Baabda-Aley elections.

No need to remind anyone how things happened, how General Aoun proposed Pierre Dakach and no one else, and how LF refused him in the beginning, then, magically he was accepted as a NEUTRAL person.

LF convinced us, and many attacked us because we said no, no he is not neutral, no we do not believe this, no we refuse.

Yesterday I was watching the news, and I saw MP Dakach with General Aoun’s blog in front of the constitutional council, exactly behind General Aoun.

Is that called neutrality ? It is true he is not attending their meetings, but it seams he is joining their campaigns.

Especially in this specific move, he is taking a definitive stance with General Aoun, and supporting the constitutional council that is supposed to give General Aoun the majority.

Not to score points or anything, I just want to remind all how things happened and how we were forced to believe he is neutral, well no he is not, and all who tried to convince us are held accountable.

I also want to ask Baabda Aley people not to forget this one, not to fall in the same trap again, Dakach is not neutral, and if they agreed on making it without elections this does not make him neutral.

Waking up time !


Filed under: Critiques, Other
Posted by Richy on 06.23.06 @ 4:40 pm | 8 Comments

Related Entries



8 Comments. Add your own...

  • 1. PK | June 23rd, 2006 at 7:38 pm

    Nobody forced you to believe that Pierre Daccash is neutral. We all know that he’s AOUNI but the statitistics that was done in that time showed that we might lose if Hizbullah voted for Daccash for this reason it was a honored escape.

  • 2. A.A | June 24th, 2006 at 4:37 am

    I don’t see the news in that.
    He was with Aoun since day1.
    Baabda aley was indeed a defeat for lf.
    By choosing him, the lf lost the battle before it had even began.

  • 3. akazoo | June 24th, 2006 at 11:16 am

    My friend, what Dakkash did is the right move. He is defending the constitution! The country is haulted for Hariri’s advantage. And Dakkash is there to make sure that such moves are against our constitution!!! Open your eyes and realize where we are going!!! If he stands next to Aoun it doesnot mean he is with aoun…

  • 4. Wanabka | June 24th, 2006 at 3:01 pm

    Seams is written double e seems ;)

  • 5. Richy | June 24th, 2006 at 6:51 pm

    akazoo, defending the council that canceled Gabriel’s electing is never the right move, but it is the move that Aoun wants him to do .

  • 6. BOULOS | June 27th, 2006 at 10:38 pm

    Pierre Dakach claims to be nuetral between LF and FPM. He clearly violated that promise. What will happen if a crucial vote is needed between HA arms and LF. Who will he vote for? Or the presidency, will he keep his promise not to side with the LF against FPM or vis versa.

    Richy made a good point and the people again got slamed. Next time give the people a choice and stop pretenting we are stupid.

    Have elections and let the people decide. If Aoun was capable of winning be it. But now its ramification time. I would have rather lost than rather say to the people hear is your only choice. Who are they to do that, they work for the people, they should not take the will of the people away. Should the LF have lost, well it tells them the people are not interested and a change would have taken place.

  • 7. nightman | January 3rd, 2007 at 11:01 pm

    Guys, i think no one is neutral in Lebanon, there are those who are with Free, Democratic and Peaceful Lebanon, among them are the LF, and those who are against all that because they look only to their interests, like 8th of March and Company, so let the “Future History” tell us what will happen to those who betrayed all the people who believe in them for the right or the wrong reasons, and God save and bless Lebanon, all Lebanon and all the Lebanese

  • 8. nicole | February 5th, 2007 at 12:18 pm

    I bet the all the LF people wonder why the leader did not sign the pre argement from bekerki. i need to know comments on that?



Leave a Reply


Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Search



Who posts here

Sections

Other LF Sites

Site Tools






Recent Comments