<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attacks on Christians in Iraqi city raise concern</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ouwet.com/n10452/regional-politics/attacks-on-christians-in-iraqi-city-raise-concern/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ouwet.com/n10452/regional-politics/attacks-on-christians-in-iraqi-city-raise-concern/</link>
	<description>Personal Views and opionions of Lebanese Forces members</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.ouwet.com/n10452/regional-politics/attacks-on-christians-in-iraqi-city-raise-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-561709</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ouwet.com/?p=2672#comment-561709</guid>
		<description>true. the difference is, march 14 christians don't have to suck up to jumblatt and compromise our principles in order to get his support. he is content just to keeps his seats in the chouf. let him run his mouth all day if he wants, he is not driving christians out of lebanon with pointless wars and takeovers of the capital, to say nothing of the effect of those things on lebanon as a state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>true. the difference is, march 14 christians don&#8217;t have to suck up to jumblatt and compromise our principles in order to get his support. he is content just to keeps his seats in the chouf. let him run his mouth all day if he wants, he is not driving christians out of lebanon with pointless wars and takeovers of the capital, to say nothing of the effect of those things on lebanon as a state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asaad</title>
		<link>http://www.ouwet.com/n10452/regional-politics/attacks-on-christians-in-iraqi-city-raise-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-557618</link>
		<dc:creator>asaad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ouwet.com/?p=2672#comment-557618</guid>
		<description>patrick 
Why dont you see what your friend gomblut 
says about bachir. IF you here him I dont think you will like him anymore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>patrick<br />
Why dont you see what your friend gomblut<br />
says about bachir. IF you here him I dont think you will like him anymore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asaad</title>
		<link>http://www.ouwet.com/n10452/regional-politics/attacks-on-christians-in-iraqi-city-raise-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-557616</link>
		<dc:creator>asaad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ouwet.com/?p=2672#comment-557616</guid>
		<description>patrick 
why dont oyu see what your friend gomblut 
says ab out bachir. IF you here him Idont think you will like him anymore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>patrick<br />
why dont oyu see what your friend gomblut<br />
says ab out bachir. IF you here him Idont think you will like him anymore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.ouwet.com/n10452/regional-politics/attacks-on-christians-in-iraqi-city-raise-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-556279</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ouwet.com/?p=2672#comment-556279</guid>
		<description>asaad,

you got it wrong. MUSLIMS got rid of christians in iraq and sudan, not america. and in the case of sudan, they murdered more than one million since the late 80s. man, some of you guvs are dhimmis to the core. look at iraq today. they kill and kick out christians in mosul, and in response American forces JUMP on them in mosul and kill the leader of al-qaeda in northern iraq, who was #1 in the north and #2 all over iraq.

with regard to lebanon, you think the MoU you signed with hezbollah (read: sucking up to ha.) is protecting the christians from all these (fictional) american/israeli conspiracies, but in reality all it's doing is giving legitimacy to hezbollah's weapons which just a few years ago general aoun and all his aounis (probably including you) were condemning daily.

you raise the name of bachir gemayel, but we are ALL familiar with what bachir gemayel said about being DHIMMIS, and ALL what he said applies to how you guys are sucking up to ha.! bach got it right, and NEVERMIND how hezbollah to this day calls him a zionist when they mention his name on the al-manar website... your friends, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>asaad,</p>
<p>you got it wrong. MUSLIMS got rid of christians in iraq and sudan, not america. and in the case of sudan, they murdered more than one million since the late 80s. man, some of you guvs are dhimmis to the core. look at iraq today. they kill and kick out christians in mosul, and in response American forces JUMP on them in mosul and kill the leader of al-qaeda in northern iraq, who was #1 in the north and #2 all over iraq.</p>
<p>with regard to lebanon, you think the MoU you signed with hezbollah (read: sucking up to ha.) is protecting the christians from all these (fictional) american/israeli conspiracies, but in reality all it&#8217;s doing is giving legitimacy to hezbollah&#8217;s weapons which just a few years ago general aoun and all his aounis (probably including you) were condemning daily.</p>
<p>you raise the name of bachir gemayel, but we are ALL familiar with what bachir gemayel said about being DHIMMIS, and ALL what he said applies to how you guys are sucking up to ha.! bach got it right, and NEVERMIND how hezbollah to this day calls him a zionist when they mention his name on the al-manar website&#8230; your friends, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asaad</title>
		<link>http://www.ouwet.com/n10452/regional-politics/attacks-on-christians-in-iraqi-city-raise-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-555690</link>
		<dc:creator>asaad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ouwet.com/?p=2672#comment-555690</guid>
		<description>america got rid of the christians in iraq and in souden . now she is tryng to get rid of christians in lebanon but she failed cause 
there is a man named michel aoun he wont let her .she tried in arb tamouz by letting 
the shiiaa and christians to collapse to each other and in 2ahdass 7 2ayar she was hoping that shiia will attack the christian 
villages but they didn't because of the wa2et tafehom ma3 ha.bil sab3inet amerca
da3amet alfolostinieh ta titkhalas  min 
almasihieh bi lubnan bas fishlit la2an ken fee bashir algemayel ou lyoum ma3am feeya la2an fee michel aoun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>america got rid of the christians in iraq and in souden . now she is tryng to get rid of christians in lebanon but she failed cause<br />
there is a man named michel aoun he wont let her .she tried in arb tamouz by letting<br />
the shiiaa and christians to collapse to each other and in 2ahdass 7 2ayar she was hoping that shiia will attack the christian<br />
villages but they didn&#8217;t because of the wa2et tafehom ma3 ha.bil sab3inet amerca<br />
da3amet alfolostinieh ta titkhalas  min<br />
almasihieh bi lubnan bas fishlit la2an ken fee bashir algemayel ou lyoum ma3am feeya la2an fee michel aoun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.ouwet.com/n10452/regional-politics/attacks-on-christians-in-iraqi-city-raise-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-552248</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 02:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ouwet.com/?p=2672#comment-552248</guid>
		<description>i don't know how many times i have to repeat myself... not only do we deal according to interests, but we have also shifted our foreign policy in order (now) to truly support democracy in the middle east and not turn our back on our allies there... even if you will not accept that we have had a change of heart, then least accept that we believe that this change in foreign policy is in our own long term best interest, even if it will have short term negative consequences. maybe this explanation is better, i don't know. you have to know that we truly are working for democracy and freedoms and stability in iraq (for example), even if not for the iraqis, then for our own long term security, because freedoms and democracy will not stop with iraq but will spread to its neighbors... and when the people who push for these freedoms finally succeed in securing those freedoms (and not in securing elections only), then it will not be long before we will see a comparable shift in middle eastern foreign policy towards the west.

believe me, all american politicians i am familiar with recognize that how we handled lebanon and syria (and iraq/iran) in the 80s was a mistake... what more can i say? we are not in the business of repeating mistakes... we did enough of repeating mistakes, and believe it or not we've actually learned from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t know how many times i have to repeat myself&#8230; not only do we deal according to interests, but we have also shifted our foreign policy in order (now) to truly support democracy in the middle east and not turn our back on our allies there&#8230; even if you will not accept that we have had a change of heart, then least accept that we believe that this change in foreign policy is in our own long term best interest, even if it will have short term negative consequences. maybe this explanation is better, i don&#8217;t know. you have to know that we truly are working for democracy and freedoms and stability in iraq (for example), even if not for the iraqis, then for our own long term security, because freedoms and democracy will not stop with iraq but will spread to its neighbors&#8230; and when the people who push for these freedoms finally succeed in securing those freedoms (and not in securing elections only), then it will not be long before we will see a comparable shift in middle eastern foreign policy towards the west.</p>
<p>believe me, all american politicians i am familiar with recognize that how we handled lebanon and syria (and iraq/iran) in the 80s was a mistake&#8230; what more can i say? we are not in the business of repeating mistakes&#8230; we did enough of repeating mistakes, and believe it or not we&#8217;ve actually learned from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ja3far</title>
		<link>http://www.ouwet.com/n10452/regional-politics/attacks-on-christians-in-iraqi-city-raise-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-552010</link>
		<dc:creator>ja3far</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ouwet.com/?p=2672#comment-552010</guid>
		<description>Patrick… i know you dont claim to be an angel..i was using a figure of speach :) I understand very well that the USA is a modern country with interests … and this is normal otherwise how did it become the leader country in the world? Example: It is clear that when there is some tension between the states in iran the number of casualties among the American soldiers in iraque rise high and some Iranians revolutionary guards die in plane carsh or for a reason or another.. while  during other days when the relation is good things are calm like these days… am sure we both understand each other… 

the Americans are not stupid to put the benefits of others above their benefits.. and this is normal.. 

When the American gave Lebanon to Syria in 1990 they had a deal with Syria… they didn’t care about democracy in Lebanon…

what I was discussing is this idea.. the American don’t care about the good well and the happiness of the people in the area if it is against their interest… at a certain stage the American were pushing for religion tension in iraque and I gave the example of the video as a proof.. it increased the hatred of  the sunnies around the arab world against the shias… we both know that it wasn’t al sader who executed sadam …we both know why the shrines of the two shia imams were destroyed in sameraa …. All these were accidents made to make the situation explode between the two sects…

The idea behind the example in Kuwait was made following the same contest.. that the American are not looking for the democracy and the benefit of the people if it is against their interest.. Kuwait is following the normal development made by other countries in the region  like bahrain… but that is 16 years after the liberation of kuwait…at that time , the interest of the states was with the kuwaiti royal family.. the same way it is now with the Saudi royal family

Any way.. the issue is not the american looking for their interest or not.. which will make them stupid if they don’t.. it is about some naïve people who think the American will drop their strategic plans and benefits for the sake of these people who like to drink coca cola…

 

salam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick… i know you dont claim to be an angel..i was using a figure of speach <img src='http://www.ouwet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I understand very well that the USA is a modern country with interests … and this is normal otherwise how did it become the leader country in the world? Example: It is clear that when there is some tension between the states in iran the number of casualties among the American soldiers in iraque rise high and some Iranians revolutionary guards die in plane carsh or for a reason or another.. while  during other days when the relation is good things are calm like these days… am sure we both understand each other… </p>
<p>the Americans are not stupid to put the benefits of others above their benefits.. and this is normal.. </p>
<p>When the American gave Lebanon to Syria in 1990 they had a deal with Syria… they didn’t care about democracy in Lebanon…</p>
<p>what I was discussing is this idea.. the American don’t care about the good well and the happiness of the people in the area if it is against their interest… at a certain stage the American were pushing for religion tension in iraque and I gave the example of the video as a proof.. it increased the hatred of  the sunnies around the arab world against the shias… we both know that it wasn’t al sader who executed sadam …we both know why the shrines of the two shia imams were destroyed in sameraa …. All these were accidents made to make the situation explode between the two sects…</p>
<p>The idea behind the example in Kuwait was made following the same contest.. that the American are not looking for the democracy and the benefit of the people if it is against their interest.. Kuwait is following the normal development made by other countries in the region  like bahrain… but that is 16 years after the liberation of kuwait…at that time , the interest of the states was with the kuwaiti royal family.. the same way it is now with the Saudi royal family</p>
<p>Any way.. the issue is not the american looking for their interest or not.. which will make them stupid if they don’t.. it is about some naïve people who think the American will drop their strategic plans and benefits for the sake of these people who like to drink coca cola…</p>
<p>salam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rambo</title>
		<link>http://www.ouwet.com/n10452/regional-politics/attacks-on-christians-in-iraqi-city-raise-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-551767</link>
		<dc:creator>rambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ouwet.com/?p=2672#comment-551767</guid>
		<description>فرار جماعي لمسيحيي "الموصل" في العراق بعد تهديدات بالابادة

11 تشرين الأول 2008
تشهد مدينة الموصل موجة فرار جماعي للعوائل المسيحية من المدينة باتجاه الاطراف بعد تصاعد عمليات القتل والاستهداف التي طالتهم خلال الايام القليلة الماضية من الجماعات الارهابيّة المسلحة. فقد ارتفع عدد العوائل المسيحية الهاربة من الموصل خلال الايام الثلاثة الماضية الى 150 عائلة بعد فرار 40 عائلة يوم امس الى قضاء الحمدانية. ورأى رئيس المؤتمر الشعبي الكلداني سامي المالح ان العوائل المسيحية تتلقى تهديدات يومية وبيانات توزع في الأزقة والشوارع التي يقيمون فيها تطالبهم بترك المدينة. واشار الى أنه لا يعرف الجهة التي توزع هذه البيانات وطالب السلطات المحلية والحكومة بكشف المجرمين. 
يذكر ان عوائل مسيحية بدأت الاسبوع الماضي بالفرار من الموصل الى المدن المسيحية الواقعة على تخوم المحافظة بموازاة الحدود الادارية مع اربيل ودهوك مثل القوش وباطنيا وتلسقف وبرطلة الى الحمدانية المعروفة بقرة قوش بعد تسجيل حالات مثل استهداف عمال وصيادلة مسيحيين في انحاء مختلفة من الموصل. 
وتعيش هذه العوائل ظروفًا حياتية مزرية حيث اتخذت من بعض المدارس والأبنية المهجورة مأوي لها مفتقدة الى أدنى الخدمات الصحية والمعيشية. 
وفي تطور آخر اعلن في الموصل تأسيس تنظيم جديد يطلق على نفسه "التجمع الوطني لمسيحيي الموصل" واستنكر البيان رقم 3 للتجمع "المحاولات الانفصالية التي يتبناها مسيحيو الاطراف". وطالب البيان الذي حمل توقيع عادل ابراهيم يعقوب بالامان والحماية من الجماعات التي تتعرض للوجود والممتلكات المسيحية في المحافظة. 
وكشفت مصادر عراقية ان مئات المسيحيين في الموصل قد اغلقوا متاجرهم وتركوا وظائفهم وغادروا المدينة تحسبا من التعرض للاغتيال او الخطف بعد اغتيال خمسة منهم خلال الايام الماضية. وتعد القوات المرتبطة بالحزبين الكرديين المرابطة في المدينة هي الاقوي. 
تجدر الاشارة الى أن سينودس أساقفة طائفة السريان الكاثوليك وجّه من دير الشرفة في درعون- حريصا، نداء لذوي الارادة الصالحة بالعمل الحثيث لوقف اعمال العنف والقتل والخطف والتهديد والتهجير التي تطول المواطنين الآمنين.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>فرار جماعي لمسيحيي &#8220;الموصل&#8221; في العراق بعد تهديدات بالابادة</p>
<p>11 تشرين الأول 2008<br />
تشهد مدينة الموصل موجة فرار جماعي للعوائل المسيحية من المدينة باتجاه الاطراف بعد تصاعد عمليات القتل والاستهداف التي طالتهم خلال الايام القليلة الماضية من الجماعات الارهابيّة المسلحة. فقد ارتفع عدد العوائل المسيحية الهاربة من الموصل خلال الايام الثلاثة الماضية الى 150 عائلة بعد فرار 40 عائلة يوم امس الى قضاء الحمدانية. ورأى رئيس المؤتمر الشعبي الكلداني سامي المالح ان العوائل المسيحية تتلقى تهديدات يومية وبيانات توزع في الأزقة والشوارع التي يقيمون فيها تطالبهم بترك المدينة. واشار الى أنه لا يعرف الجهة التي توزع هذه البيانات وطالب السلطات المحلية والحكومة بكشف المجرمين.<br />
يذكر ان عوائل مسيحية بدأت الاسبوع الماضي بالفرار من الموصل الى المدن المسيحية الواقعة على تخوم المحافظة بموازاة الحدود الادارية مع اربيل ودهوك مثل القوش وباطنيا وتلسقف وبرطلة الى الحمدانية المعروفة بقرة قوش بعد تسجيل حالات مثل استهداف عمال وصيادلة مسيحيين في انحاء مختلفة من الموصل.<br />
وتعيش هذه العوائل ظروفًا حياتية مزرية حيث اتخذت من بعض المدارس والأبنية المهجورة مأوي لها مفتقدة الى أدنى الخدمات الصحية والمعيشية.<br />
وفي تطور آخر اعلن في الموصل تأسيس تنظيم جديد يطلق على نفسه &#8220;التجمع الوطني لمسيحيي الموصل&#8221; واستنكر البيان رقم 3 للتجمع &#8220;المحاولات الانفصالية التي يتبناها مسيحيو الاطراف&#8221;. وطالب البيان الذي حمل توقيع عادل ابراهيم يعقوب بالامان والحماية من الجماعات التي تتعرض للوجود والممتلكات المسيحية في المحافظة.<br />
وكشفت مصادر عراقية ان مئات المسيحيين في الموصل قد اغلقوا متاجرهم وتركوا وظائفهم وغادروا المدينة تحسبا من التعرض للاغتيال او الخطف بعد اغتيال خمسة منهم خلال الايام الماضية. وتعد القوات المرتبطة بالحزبين الكرديين المرابطة في المدينة هي الاقوي.<br />
تجدر الاشارة الى أن سينودس أساقفة طائفة السريان الكاثوليك وجّه من دير الشرفة في درعون- حريصا، نداء لذوي الارادة الصالحة بالعمل الحثيث لوقف اعمال العنف والقتل والخطف والتهديد والتهجير التي تطول المواطنين الآمنين.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.ouwet.com/n10452/regional-politics/attacks-on-christians-in-iraqi-city-raise-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-551428</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ouwet.com/?p=2672#comment-551428</guid>
		<description>ja3far... never said we're angels, and i never said our foreign policy has always been what it is now. but we *have* always been clear about our reasons.

for example, when we first helped bring saddam to power decades ago, we were wrong at the time to believe the arabs and the muslims weren't ready for democracy, and therefore that dealing with him was a nuisance but better than dealing with khomeinists who might come to power if there were free elections... our foreign policy then was not what it is today... on the other hand, we were clear about our reason then, just as we are clear today about the reversal in our foreign policy and our desire to see democracies rise up and flourish in the middle east.

your example of returning the kuwaiti royal family to power is a poor one. democracy in kuwait is doing just fine... women are now voting and running in the elections, court cases are being won every year expanding the rights of foreign workers and religious minorities, the secular movement is gaining strength (e.g., ibtihal al-khatib)... sure islamist movements are gaining strength, but so is the movement that supports the separation of the government from the religion, the expansion of rights, equality between men and women, equal rights for christians and shia and other religious minorities... the kuwaiti youth are some of the most forward-thinking arabs in the middle east, including those who are religious.

and yes, i'm well aware that eid al-adha fell on one day for the shia and the next day for the sunni, and that saddam was executed on the sunni day. and i saw the video, like you and everyone else. who cares that they were al-sadr's guys. as i said before, "throwing a bone to the 80% who are shia and who were oppressed under saddam and then working to reincorporate the less than 20% who are sunni back into the political process is a lot better than appeasing the 20% and losing the 80 to the likes of jaysh almahdi, the badr organization, etc. you have to see things in terms of their consequences. america is a modern state, which plays by the rules of a modern state, which are all about interests… now maybe that’s something the fine folks in da7iyeh don’t understand, but thank god the iraqis are actually starting to get it…"

now do you get it, or should i consider you in the same class as those fine folks in da7iyeh i mentioned?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ja3far&#8230; never said we&#8217;re angels, and i never said our foreign policy has always been what it is now. but we *have* always been clear about our reasons.</p>
<p>for example, when we first helped bring saddam to power decades ago, we were wrong at the time to believe the arabs and the muslims weren&#8217;t ready for democracy, and therefore that dealing with him was a nuisance but better than dealing with khomeinists who might come to power if there were free elections&#8230; our foreign policy then was not what it is today&#8230; on the other hand, we were clear about our reason then, just as we are clear today about the reversal in our foreign policy and our desire to see democracies rise up and flourish in the middle east.</p>
<p>your example of returning the kuwaiti royal family to power is a poor one. democracy in kuwait is doing just fine&#8230; women are now voting and running in the elections, court cases are being won every year expanding the rights of foreign workers and religious minorities, the secular movement is gaining strength (e.g., ibtihal al-khatib)&#8230; sure islamist movements are gaining strength, but so is the movement that supports the separation of the government from the religion, the expansion of rights, equality between men and women, equal rights for christians and shia and other religious minorities&#8230; the kuwaiti youth are some of the most forward-thinking arabs in the middle east, including those who are religious.</p>
<p>and yes, i&#8217;m well aware that eid al-adha fell on one day for the shia and the next day for the sunni, and that saddam was executed on the sunni day. and i saw the video, like you and everyone else. who cares that they were al-sadr&#8217;s guys. as i said before, &#8220;throwing a bone to the 80% who are shia and who were oppressed under saddam and then working to reincorporate the less than 20% who are sunni back into the political process is a lot better than appeasing the 20% and losing the 80 to the likes of jaysh almahdi, the badr organization, etc. you have to see things in terms of their consequences. america is a modern state, which plays by the rules of a modern state, which are all about interests… now maybe that’s something the fine folks in da7iyeh don’t understand, but thank god the iraqis are actually starting to get it…&#8221;</p>
<p>now do you get it, or should i consider you in the same class as those fine folks in da7iyeh i mentioned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ja3far</title>
		<link>http://www.ouwet.com/n10452/regional-politics/attacks-on-christians-in-iraqi-city-raise-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-551138</link>
		<dc:creator>ja3far</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ouwet.com/?p=2672#comment-551138</guid>
		<description>ino patrick...saying you are an angel dont make you one... if the americans use the democratic and freedom as titles, doesnt mean they really want other to practice that ..

ok i believe the american practice that in their country but their international policy is anything but that,,,

why did they return the kuwaity royal family to the throne when they withdraw sadam from iraque? 

did you forgot that they killed sadam the day of one of the muslims holiest days and spread a video all over the world showing someone similar to al sader doing the execution and having shia celebrating? was such an action for the benefit on the good will of the iraquis or to increase secterian tensions?

i was happy the day the american came in iraque... i was so stupid to believe their BS. i hoped they will do to the area what they did in europe after WW2... but as reality prevealed i became just another one of those people who all togather made Bush the most hated man in the world...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ino patrick&#8230;saying you are an angel dont make you one&#8230; if the americans use the democratic and freedom as titles, doesnt mean they really want other to practice that ..</p>
<p>ok i believe the american practice that in their country but their international policy is anything but that,,,</p>
<p>why did they return the kuwaity royal family to the throne when they withdraw sadam from iraque? </p>
<p>did you forgot that they killed sadam the day of one of the muslims holiest days and spread a video all over the world showing someone similar to al sader doing the execution and having shia celebrating? was such an action for the benefit on the good will of the iraquis or to increase secterian tensions?</p>
<p>i was happy the day the american came in iraque&#8230; i was so stupid to believe their BS. i hoped they will do to the area what they did in europe after WW2&#8230; but as reality prevealed i became just another one of those people who all togather made Bush the most hated man in the world&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
