I salute u for ur wisdom and mainly ur patience but seriously don’t waste ur time on replying back to these idiots of March 8.

However i would really like to hear more abt ur opinion n thoughts on that blog.

my comment about weapons was meant ironically.it came after many were proud to the displacement of Sunnis with weapons,and see themselves as winners even though the funerals of their own people are fully in “progress”.I had many discussions with these types and have noticed that they are not what they indicate.

i like to read your comments but i think the time will come and you will give up, “di2 lmay may”.

i wish you good luck.

but it is funny that you used the word attack. it sums up everything that was discussed by everyone.

assuming that what you said is true. why would christians need protection whether in an MOU or any other sort of agreement.

in your logic, aoun’s support of hezbollah prevented hezbollah’s attack. so anyone who does not support hezbollah can be attacked? that is what can be derived from what you said. so it is either support or get attacked?

FPM did not support the government during the syrian days. should they have done that to avoid being oppressed or attacked?

you said aoun’s support stopped hezbollah. this means: hezbollah attacks everyone- you support him- you save yourself.

i never mentioned anything about freedom fighters sir. but when were hezbollah attacked? since 7 in the morning, the airport road was being blocked. future tv attacked hezbollah? or was it sevan radio? or, or, or…

did those 6 today mourners attack hezbollah?

you have full right to support aoun, i repsect that. but there is no way to justify what has been done in beirut.

if you think like that, then don’t blame PSP, or FM FPM or LF for thinking of doing the same sometime later in the future - gof forbid really.

i don’t like to talk about my own political affiliations, but i don’t support LF, FM or PSP. i don’t support FPM or amal or hezbollah. but when you see what has happened, you can’t take sides just like that coz of your political affiliations.

it is so easy to find an excuse to justify one’s actions. you know that more than me.

above, i told paul that i disagree with him that he is thinking of arming. paul does not agree with hezbollah (apologies paul for speaking in your name). so what shall he do then? you just agreed with him indirectly, and gave him an argument.

thank you for contemplating the skin complexion of geagea.

Paul,

i disagree with you. bullets not ballots will lead the country into destruction. amal and hizbollah committed horrible atrocities, regardless of how hard they try to explain this. no one should be like them.

Libanon,

how on earth did aoun stop the chaos in the Christian areas? seriously, let’s see if you are right. but with facts please, not slogans- and not a reference to the MOU with Hezbollah.

My two critiques are that Shoqueir and the illegal phone network will be maintained, and that Sanioura will not declare war on Hezbollah, even though it is obvious that they have declared war on Lebanon, the Lebanese people, their spirit, freedoms, etc. If the government doesn’t stick by their position here, then any decision will have to pass through Hezbollah before it is actually implemented, and this poses a problem for Lebanon, and Christians especially (in my opinion). I do not like what is currently ocurring in Beirut, but you can’t reason with Hezbollah, they don’t want compromise, they call for dialogue and then back down when the time actually comes for it. The only way to deal with them is to finish them off. No to Hezbollah as a miltia, and no to Hezbollah as a poloitical party, because it is obvious that this (politics) is their cover to retain weapons, support, etc. In short, NO to Hezbollah in any capacity in Lebanon as they are being run today - Go back to Iran!