17 Comments. Add your own...

• 1. Bachir 7ay Fina | November 28th, 2007 at 9:14 pm

  heik lhei2a ra7 ykoun michel sleiman el ra2is.
  Ye3ne jaddadna la la7oud 6 snin jded.
  Badde 2efham chou men koun 3melna ne7na bi 14march.
  Law men zamen 2eblo fi la michel sleimen w 7atou w ma fetna bel faragh.
  f*** 14 march kella li ano terem li lezim ta3mil chi tchil lebnen men me7ento khafit.

  michel sleiman = emil la7oud = HA.

• 2. Tarek | November 28th, 2007 at 9:15 pm

  I totally agree with you. I wish it is just a maneuver to persuade Aoun and let him see that someone else might become a president. Maybe he’ll back off from presidency and choose to have a bigger share in the new government with a president that is not pro-Syrian. If it is not a maneuver, these guys have failed us.

• 3. johnny | November 28th, 2007 at 9:15 pm

  The US invites Syria to the conference and adds the Golan Heights to the agenda, Syria attends hoping for some benefits, the Iranians watch worried and we are left for the dogs!

  Who cares if he’s a past Syrian ass-licker? As long as he’s weak and useless, Hariri gets to keep his economic interests… Jumblat stations in the middle… Hezbollah is not worried about disarment… Aoun and Geagea cannot tolerate any sided candidate and the Christians are divided and weak as usual…

  Bottom line: Nothing new really… We are scewed again!

• 4. rony | November 28th, 2007 at 9:16 pm

  ´´That will go down as M14 biggest failure in 2 years and a major drawback for Christians´´

  that is the only biggest failure of M14 bi ra2iykoun? leich fi chi tabi3eh 3imlou la 7adit halla2??

  ´´ and Aoun is still stubborn and refusing to sit and talk on another candidate than himself ..´´: leich ma di3eh kill 2ill masi7iyeh yilta2o ma3o w khsousatan masi7iyit M14, walla kemeina haydeh ma smi3touwa?? w wayno mr ja3ja3?? leich ma charraf ?2iza hal2ad maz3ouj min aoun, w leich ma bi rou7 ywejho bill rabyeh kawno pro-syrian like u r saying?? ma houweh 2ill 2ossa killa bi masi7iyit M14 will 7arireh ma bya3moul 2illa yalleh baddo yeh mich sa7??

  i think everything must be upgrade in this website expecially ur mind!

• 5. Bachir 7ay Fina | November 28th, 2007 at 9:21 pm

  rony
  chou lbatrak ya 7abibe michel 3awn la houwe ya3mil mouchawarat 3a zaw2o????
  ba3dein bado lika2 ma bya3emlo bi nos din bayto ye3ne ana lza3im el masi7e l2aw7ad.
  3awn sermeye, houwe aktar chakhes 7ara2 din el masi7iye.

• 6. fad14 | November 28th, 2007 at 9:30 pm

  Please say Dawlit El Ra2ees Michael Aoun.

  The mad man got appointed and got kicked out and deserted the army and he still refers to himself as
  Dawlit El Ra2ees Al Imad Michael Aoun.

  He should be called “Samahat el Harban Lahwis Teez Aoun”

  Michael el Murr is branching out as well as Berri and they will do that in favor of Michael Sleiman as he is neutral.

  Most of our army is 1/2 syrian ass lickers/ syrian agents and the other 1/2 are aoun supporters who still beleive he didnt leave them on 13 October and believe he loved french coffee.

  I think its a manouver and soon enough Aoun wil reject it and they will end up electing whoever they want.

• 7. rony | November 28th, 2007 at 10:22 pm

  bachir 7ayt fina

  et mazbout aoun sirmeyeh, w ja3ja3 smalla 2iddiss, kein 3amm bi defi3 3ann 2ill masi7iyeh kill hall wa2itma heikeh???

  teneh chi halla2 wi2fit 3all beit??? leich hayda za3ajoun??? 2inno yilta2o bi bayto la aoun??? 2izeh heikeh fiyoun y2oulo…bass yi7ko, yint2o….3al2alileh chi 2ilo ta3meh …

• 8. Homo Libanus | November 28th, 2007 at 10:32 pm

  I think it is too early to call this a disaster. It could be a good cop/bad cop game to trap 3awn. If it is not a game, then, it is a disaster. We never had a good experience with the Army: Lahoud? 3awn? Shehab, godfather of the Deuxieme Bureau? The guys cannot function in a democracy. Suleiman’s brother in law is also Syrian working for Assad!

• 9. الله لا يردّك | November 28th, 2007 at 10:49 pm

  And not only!

  3adilo soury!!!! head of the intelligence of Assad.

  No god please let’s don’t do this mistake.

  maybe we deserve this with our fucking politicians min geagea w gerr….ta yelhak Joumblat.

• 10. taaaaaj | November 28th, 2007 at 11:12 pm

  Guys!
  We need Choices!
  Any General would be a bad choice but between no president at all and having a general as president I choose having a president and between Aoun and Slaimen I choose Slaimen.
  Ben el Khara will AKhra ……..

• 11. Elie.F.C. | November 29th, 2007 at 12:46 am

  shi bida77ik wi7yet alla, inno come on guys ,every politician in lebanon has more than 2 faces,let’s start with jumblat,does anyone of you guys remember his famous sentence(el mookhtara is the gate of damascus)?, hariri if he had the chance in 2004 and elected ghattas khoury the syrians would have stayed 30 more years and aoun out and geagea down, LF consider HA the major problem in lebanon while in 2005 elections no one had the guts to mention that, aoun considered HA as terrorists while now he has the famous memorendem with them and they are more than tanjara w le2it ghataha, guys life for those people carries on and on while our lives stopped in their door gates, please wake up,

• 12. Sicario | November 29th, 2007 at 1:14 am

  Dear N10452,

  You are committing a fatal mistake … we all agree that GMS was a Syrian puppet but between destroying Lebanon and having him as president i prefer the second option … in 4 years we will have the majority of the Christian votes , and we will elect a President this time with a Flavor. Patience is a virtue and i thing DSG learned that in Prison … If we impose a President we ALL loose if they impose a President we All loose . Let’s elect him i am sure that he will be better than Hrawi or Lahoud , he doesn’t look to be a tyrant he’s more ”bassit” it’s sad but at least he’s inoffensive ..

• 13. gary | November 29th, 2007 at 2:55 am

  14 mars is burning suleiman for good ha & aoun will never accept him

• 14. mikel | November 29th, 2007 at 3:46 am

  Sicario

  When lahoud first came we also though he was gonna be useful.

  But after a short while during his presidency, we realized that no good was gonna come from him.

  Remember when Mel7em Baraket sang him that song and then appologized for it?

  Sleiman’s history is a copy of lahouss’s.

• 15. lady hawk | November 29th, 2007 at 1:01 pm

  Well let’s all admit it, WE Lost, and the martyrs that were killed in bombings died FOR NOTHINGGGGGGGGG,we deserve not Only Michel Sleiman, But we deserve Orange head Michel Aoun too. we,Christian, are always used to be get on our knees, we do not deserve to Live in FreeDom. And The futur President shows that clearly,inno why to fight for over than 2 years when they will accept A syrian President? they dragged us and the whole country in a Flat Line , why? I am sorry but Our leaders FAILED USSSSSS.

• 16. Maha | November 29th, 2007 at 1:51 pm

  N10452, Christians sabotage themselves for nothing actually. Such a shame. I read a decent piece on World Security Network front page about Lebanon: “Since the ’70s, the Christians are in the habit of continuously weakening their position. It is grotesque, but they fight tooth and nail to accomplish this goal.” Looks like it.

• 17. libneni | December 3rd, 2007 at 9:57 pm

  sa7tein 3a albkom ya march 14. u were doomed to fail since u accepted to keep lahoud in b3abda in march 14th…
  allah la yredkom…

Leave a Reply

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed