Why i refuse Michel Suleiman .. at The Ouwet Front: A Lebanese Forces Blog

Why i refuse Michel Suleiman ..

Posted by N10452

I was among the first to oppose Gen.Suleiman for presidency, i refuse him when M8 proposed him, and opposed him even more when March 14 proposed him. I was against him from the start, and will answer why in details as per one of our readers’ request ( Delta).

You ask me why we dont give him a chance ? Isnt he better than an empty chair in Baabda ?? Isnt he better than Dictator Aoun

Obviously and as i stated on several occasions, even a monkey in charge will do a better job than Aoun, so yes he is least worse than Aoun, because at least i know who he is and what he is capable of .. mitil ma i was saying to one of my friends ..
ra2iss bala ree7a a7san min ra2iss bala rass ..

Isnt he better than an empty chair in Baabda ?? i honestly cant answer that, since empty chair was never an option we should have considered …

Now giving this man a chance is not something i would do, and i truly believe M14 did a big mistake that they will regret later on..
My reasons are the following :

1- Never an army general has managed to rule a country in a fair and just way, never an army general will be able to understand politics like politicians do, never an army general will be able to apply democracy as it is …
This is a lesson we should learned from our history, from every single country’s history ..

2- Suleiman’s history is nothing to be proud of, he has backstabbed us on several occasions, he took over the army when Syrians invaded Baabda, he assisted the Syrians then and army intelligence, directly or indirectly in torturing, kidnapping and even assassinating our activitists and leaders (Fawzi el Rassi, Ramzi Irani, Eliano el Mirr, Nadim Abdel Nour, Toufic Hindi, Selmen Smeha, Fadi Chamati, Pierre Boulos etc etc etc .. and above all Dr.Samir Geagea).

How can you trust an army general who shot at his own men ?? How can you trust a general who was collaborating with the ennemy and did not apologize for it nor regret it nor stopped it !!

3- Three incidents here that are worthy mentioning that make this man a total incompetent specially for a position such as the presidential seat:

The Black Sunday incident:
Islamists were demonstrating in large numbers near Achrafieh and the Danish embassy, the army deployed in small numbers and soon was given an order to withdraw as the islamists started causing chaos, and later invaded literraly Achrafieh without any intervention or whatsoever ..

Where was Sleiman ? apparently he had asked for a day off ? or was sick ?

Same scenario occured when the Aounists along with the Terrorists Hezbollah ‘peacefully’ blocked all roads, i was there on the streets that day and saw how the army acted, not doing anything instead of avoiding trouble, and Sleiman on that day also apparently was sick or something like that, rumors even spread that he demissioned …

Those two events could be interpreted in two ways, either he chickened out or he acted passively to exploit the situation and mark political points ..

Even though the first option is valid, i started getting more convinced of the 2nd one after the Nahr el Bared clashes. I asked many people and read a lot about the delay in the army actions during that battle, and who gave the OK to start it, and found it the ones who took the decision to go were in disaccord with Suleiman who was still hesitating ..

And here ironically we find the name of the late Francois El-Hajj who was in disagreement with Sleiman in how to conduct the battles, as well as the Commandos units who were the ones who took the initiative even though no official decision was taken.

Added to that, It was reported in Al-Akhbar papers that El-Hajj was enraged on two occasions when Sleiman gave the terrorists in Nahr el Bared a break to get some food and relocate, and George Khamis’s plan to sweep the camp quickly was also rejected for pure political purposes ..

Sleiman was scoring points while the army’s bravest men were dying.

And you tell me give him a chance ??

I tell you : How can you give a chance to someone who lets his own soldiers play football over their comrads’ graves ???

PS: To add another argument, maybe its advised to critisize him while he is still not a president, because once he’s there, his intelligence will start working like Lahoud’s one worked, and who knows maybe he has me already on his black list

Filed under: Critiques, Lebanon, Political
Posted by N10452 on 12.18.07 @ 1:38 pm |

Related Entries

36 Comments. Add your own...

1. sicario | December 18th, 2007 at 2:53 pm

who gives a sh.. of what you think ….

mfalsaf ou mesheh shou a7ssan el fawda,michel Aoun ama Michel Sleiman?
2. N10452 | December 18th, 2007 at 3:06 pm

sicario,
dont reply if you dont give a shit …
U d spare us ur useless replies ..
3. الله لا يردّك | December 18th, 2007 at 3:25 pm

N10452,

Don’t forget that Sleiman’s brother in law was Assad Spokesman too! How do you think he arrives to be general?

Please we should point on this too.

Anyway your comment was great. No Sleiman in Baabda Please.
4. Michele | December 18th, 2007 at 3:38 pm

Sicario, a typical orange!!! Don’t wanna listen and respect the other…

N. i care and i’m sure a lot do as well, otherwise we won’t be reading your postings!

Keep up the good work!
5. johnny | December 18th, 2007 at 3:53 pm

Blinded by hate, you’re left with nothing but trash…

What’s funny though, is that he was imposed by your own allies. And what’s even funnier, is that they get to mingle with what belongs to you, while you have no say in their share of the pie.

Let it be. You might learn one day…
6. Pierre Richa | December 18th, 2007 at 4:01 pm

I just wanted to tell you that I always admire your articles and your sense of humour.

But this time allow me to use the same type of words and contents to express you my top level of admiration for your sense of humour!!!

1- “even a “”monkey”" in charge will do a better job than Aoun”. sure I agree with you that Dr. Smair Geagea will do it

2- “ra2iss bala ree7a a7san min ra2iss bala “”rass”", REALLY I admire how you critisize your Leader, Bala Rass. In our beautiful coutry, bala rass = Assla3!!!!

3- ” never an army general will be able to understand politics like politicians do”
Sure, am with u 100%!!! especially like Mr. Zahra,, he will never understand politics after cming from el Barbara Check point, where he used to take money and Breads from people… HEHEHE Gharib amerkoun ya chrik…wel anka ano ma kein atti3 men 7add el generaliyeh, bass ken esmo zabbit bi haydike el melichia, ya3neh kelbein la zeit el zaribeh!!!!

4- “”"Suleiman’s history is nothing to be proud of, he has backstabbed us on several occasions, he took over the army when Syrians invaded Baabda”"”"
OUPS, didn’t your proud Dr. GeaGea with Emile Lahoud at that time who facilitates the enter of the Syrian to Baabda!!! Man really amazing your way of writing History, the same one you are saying that:”This is a lesson we should learned from our history, from every single country’s history ” and you don’t even know it!!!! Funny :):):):)

5- “How can you trust an army general who shot at his own men ??” Could you please give us Facts??!?!?! Thank you in advance if you will be able to do it!!!

6- “How can you trust a general who was collaborating with the ennemy and did not apologize for it nor regret it nor stopped it ”
Ahh haydeh zamateit fiya “did not apologize ” ahhhhh that’s why you are now in lve with Jounblat (Yalli hajjar el christians men el jabal!!), and in love with Nayla Mouawad (The daily visitor to Anjar), …. and all Christian Leaders in 14 MArch…ahhh ok….you are right, because they apologies for being the soul mate of the Syrians…ahhh ok, man ma3ak ha2 … bekiyo ya 7aram 3all TV wa2ta, I remember Jounblat on kalam el Nass that Night!!!!

7- The Black Sunday incident!!!!

My Apologies Mr. N…but at that day, the Interior Security was in charge of the demonstration, because Ministry of Internal affairs who gave them the green light for demonstrating, and the army was against it, especially that our Hero (Allah yer7ammo w yer7amm trabo, El Battal Francois el Hajj), who was in charge of the Army movement and the first one against your (Ass7abak el Future,,,Al moutatarrifoun,) and the ones to hate them especially after a7dass el dounieh!!!!

N WALLAW…!!!! BA3ERFAK AZKA MEN HEIK!!!!!
I DON’T KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH YOU MAN!!!

TAKE A COUPLE OF DAYS AS VACATION!!!

YOU NEED IT, BALLACHEIT ETHALWISS!!!!!

TAKE CARE

MY BEST REGARDS!!!!
7. Michele | December 18th, 2007 at 4:17 pm

Tssss, tssss! Pierre Richa is an another orange with a big O!!!!! When they don’t find arguments to discuss they always run back to the allegations.
Although i respect what ever u mentioned above but why don’t u stick to the article my friend?

PS: I never heard, Murr, Wahab, Franjieh, Lahoud and all till this day pro-syriens apologizing to you fellow aounists to what they made you go through! Yet Ur ClAoun is best buddies with them.

Pity!!!!!!!
8. N10452 | December 18th, 2007 at 4:40 pm

Pierre Richa,
Ana ma 3am halwiss bass 7adertak ma bta3erif to2ra my posts .. in fact u dont know how to read at all to come and critisze like that .. have u read my previous posts on as7abna el Sunnites and those alliances ?? have u read my continuous critics on Hakim and Hariri and co ???

Or u just bother yourself to comment whenever the mad general is mentioned ??

I thank you for ur replies but wish you had taken a bit more time and wrote a respectful reply and constructive one ..

Nonetheless, i will answer you :

1- Dr.Geagea is not a candidate… ur reply is lame.

2- Again he is not a candidate, dont know why u brought his name here.

3- Mr.Zahra jorssa 3al ouwet and does not represent me .. i ve said it times and times bass ma 7ada byisma3 ..

4- Again i didnt mention Geagea in my post yet u bring his name up, Dr.Geagea was fought and almost destroyed by Aoun, he wanted to get rid of him and he did not resist the Syrians who entered Baabda .. there was no reason to commit suicide after Aoun has dragged us almost there ..
But i must say you are ingrateful for the help LF provided against the Syrians in the Liberation war, la2anno lawou ma min el madfa3iyye .. ken Aoun akal hawa min zamen ..

5- i dont have evidence of him shooting his own men, but he did so by letting the Syrians go into Baabda and shoot those soldiers … its even worse than collaborating ..

6- I will never forgive Jumblatt however the patriarch made a historic reconcliation in the Mountain which am bound by .. and since Jumblatt turned on the Syrians, i see no reason not to have him on my side … but always remember who he is ..

7- The Black Sunday incident!!!!

Apologies Mr. Richa,
but the army should have acted on that day,
specially our hero which am sure wanted to do something but was stopped..

I Blame the Sunnites for letting those groups out in the public like that .. i have always done that ..

You take a couple of days to read me before judging that way …

And ur sense of humor needs some work, i dont go to insults so spare me urs … keep ur debate on a respectable level ..

Regards
9. N10452 | December 18th, 2007 at 4:41 pm

Michele,
Thank u for ur support ..

Much appreciated.
10. GARY | December 18th, 2007 at 4:50 pm

i heard that suleiman was not bad during 1975 -1988 so maybe he will go back to his roots.
anyway at this point i don t think we have a lot of choices( suleiman or aoun )lets vote guys.
11. Fred | December 18th, 2007 at 5:02 pm

N,
i also have some reasons not to like Suleiman. In fact in other country he would have been requested to resign at least in 2 situations where he was directly responsible for failures:
1- After 3 monthes of siege and battles in Nahr Bared where we lost the best of our brave men, all the leadership of Fat7 Islam managed to escape in what they called surprising “Houjoum Mou3akiss” . This is a huge bug and failure for the plan and commandment of army.But in Lebanon we always “min Tannish”. but by respect to all our heroes soldiers who put their lives to finish this battle there should have been a trial for the head of army for such failure.

2- The assasination of General Hajj in the heart of a military zone between presidential palace, defence ministry and lots of military points is a huge failure for the army that didnt even notice that one of its top generals have been under monitoring by terrorists and then didnt notice a car with bom entering an army stronghold.

I dont trust such person climbing on the body of martyrs and presenting his personal mistakes as part of the acheivements of his brave soldiers
12. theresinia | December 18th, 2007 at 5:07 pm

N,

I have no idea who you are, but I want to CONGRATULATE you for your perspicacity, and the correctness of your analysis. My friends the Aounists will SOON discover what I discovered before them, that HE became a LIAR and a PRO-SYRIAN!!!

In addition, I agree with you about General Sleiman: I ALWAYS heard in the past that he was very pro-syrian. I suppose that the americans must have made some sort of arrangement…and put some pressure over March 14…Once someone is pro-syrian, HE REMAINS pro-syrian or ….???

The big question: “is Aoun better than Sleiman”? I would answer the following:
1 - Aoun has sold his soul to become president, so maybe if he becomes president he could recover some of his old values (although I am not sure the syrians will let him free…remember “once you are in their hands, they have power over you”);
2- Aoun has lost an enormous amout of his popularity, and because he suffers from acute MEGALOMANIA, he would want to do some “good” actions to recover popularity (every time the Tayyar loses some university elections he becomes very upset and no one dares to give him the details).
3- So if I say, AOUN would be a lesser evil than Sleiman, this can give you an idea how bad would be Sleiman for president!!!!

Sorry for not being constructive today, but this is reality. POOR LEBANON !!!! The most beautiful country, with a majority of good and honest people, with great minds and artists (as no country can have), with poets, good hearts, culture and hospitality…

l
13. Pierre Richa | December 18th, 2007 at 5:34 pm

Dear N

Thank you for your reply!!!
But first let me clear some points:

- First am not Orangist, and am the first to criticise both Aoun and Geagea.

- Second, yes am with the army, and with Michel Sleiman, because Lebanese people and as per your yesterday post about the parking, needs a person to put them below a BOOTS

- when Hakim went out from prison and Aoun came from PAris, I knew that we will never have another peaceful day in our country, and especially between us Christians, and I think this is obvious,

- but all I see is that you criticise 1 criminal (Aoun), and you forgot the other (El Professeur, azde el docteur!!)

So why not be on the same way between two Idiots and two crazy persons, both of them gave black days for our people, and both of them were bad politics.

And as for me in defending Suleiman, because in all the facts that you described above you can’t give a shit of evidence, and that’s all…
With the judgment of all the military personal, that he is a good guy, all what he did during the Syrian occupation, is trying to fulfill his duty as per the recommendation of all Lebanese - Syrian ASS lickers: ” HARIRI, MOUAWAD, BERRI, JOUNBLAT, WAHHABB, LAHOUD, ….”
And on the other way, he kept good peoples like the Hero Francois and other generals (LF supporters) and a very advanced positions.
So if you want to blame him, you will have to blame all fucking politicians, that are now angels coming from the sky!!!!

At least he didn’t do any thing wrong, and if ou have proofs please let us know, may be you will allow us to take precautions from a man that we don’k know as mush as you do!!!!

Take Care

I told you before, keep the good work, but be FAIR!!! don’t take any party side…
I think that I start to know you, in contrary of THERISINA!!! You are a PRO - LF, but an LF from the gold era, an LF from the days of El Cheik BACHIR!!!!, not from the black days of LF, and you know what I mean.
So only transmit your opinion and don’t fear the comments of other,
Ask someone very close to El Cheikh Bachir, and he will give you the details of that very loved pictures of Geagea followers, the one that he is chacking hands with El Cheikh, and they will tell you that they were ending a meeting where el Cheick (khala3o kaff 3a ni3o lal Hakim), w heik la tchouf 3anjad addeich bi 7ebbo ba3eid!!!!

Haydak was a leader!!! haydak was an LF leader!!!
Keep in mind that no one, especially Christian will stay alive in this country if he is really a prject of a LEADER!!!!! no one, and the list is full, starting with : El Cheick to DANI CHAMOUN, and ending by Goubran Toueini and Hero Francois El Hajj….
No one,…don’t you think if they ever feared that Dr. Geagea or Aoun will be good Christians leaders and not Puppet!!! certainly they could have killed them in a very peacful matter!!!

Sorry for talking so long…
But am so SAD for a country in which all YOUNGs are being just a shit of followers for the Puppet politicians we have: Nayla Mouawad, El Bébe Michel Mouawad, Crazy Michel Aoun, the Weappons dealer Fares Souaid, the Guilty Dr. Geagea, and all Christians- Syrian Ass Lickers!!!!!
14. EV | December 18th, 2007 at 6:29 pm

N
I also have been always against Suleiman in my postings here and there. His strong syrian roots will come back to haunt him, and he might end up like Bashir and Renee Moawad if he does not comply. His past weaknesses are no comfort and I strongly think that he will be another lahoud.

I have never heard Suleiman speak publicly except recently that insensitive speech he gave at Francois El Hajj home, saying to the family of the victim that the army has thousands like Hajj. That is lame stupid eulogy even if he meant it. That shows how military have no diplomacy.

M14 has undoubtedly made a mistake, they should have had the guts to go after 50+1 even if it would have irritated the clown and HA. At least it would have shown to the world our determination.

I wonder whether the killing of Hajj has woken up Suleiman or tamed him. Time wil tell. Unfortunately, he will take that chair.

I disagree with you on one minor point. I think Fouad Chehab as a military general did good for the country even with maktab el tani. There was law and order and if my memory is correct, he founded the social security system, which many lebanese benefit from up to this day.

Keep up the good postings.
15. someone | December 18th, 2007 at 6:43 pm

Sunnis are fanatics
Shiites are iranians
LF people are israelis
Druze / Jumblatt are murderers..

and you aounists… did u manage to find a nice nickname for yourselves????? or are you fond of giving all the lebanese people nicknames here and there????

stop the hate speech…

peace.
16. theresinia | December 18th, 2007 at 7:10 pm

N10452,

1 - AOUN is blocking the election;
2 - AOUN is accusing Hariri & Co. of blocking the elections!!
3- It is clear, that AOUN is going to sabotage the elections while putting the blame on Hariri & Co.
4- So, his strategy is to forbid anyone to arrive to Baabda if it is NOT HIMSELF… this is the GOOD NEWS. Because it means that Sleiman will be blocked for until X’mas, or New Year, or Easter, or Eternity…
5- Now the bad news: should we say YES to AOUN IF HE ACCEPTS the 100 conditions he wants to put upon us ???
It would be fun, to reverse the engine.

Since the country has to choose between Evil and his Friend, let’s have FUN…we have nothing else to do…and no MORE TO LOSE !!!
17. Bachir 7ay Fina | December 18th, 2007 at 8:32 pm

N te7lilak mazbout 100%
bass ma tekhoud bi osit antoine zahra 3ala 7ake el 3awniye.
lama ken antoine zahra 3al 7ajiz wala soure ken ye7lam yo2ta3.
heda 2ensen mou2awim byesthil ykoun neyib w aktar.
18. MM | December 18th, 2007 at 9:47 pm

The sad reality is that Aoun and March 14 could have gotten a president elected if the General’s ego was not so inflated by all the lackies he has running around him. Instead, he mistook all the hot air HA was filling his head with as real and genuine support instead of just a smart strategy to further HA’s goals and increase their price in the upcoming settlement that will sadly happen at Aoun’s expense. History is sadly repeating itself. The last time Aoun was in a position of power Lebanon was devastated for two years and then marginalized for 15 more by Syria. I hope we are not devastated again at the hands of Rabieh’s orange General. Aounis please wake up!!!
19. Rodge | December 18th, 2007 at 10:26 pm

Eventhough i don’t agree on Sleiman as President, for personal reasons related to his history with the syrians and their allies, and also for the principle of refusing a military in power. I was in the first place against Sleiman, and i’m still, but i think after what happened in the last 3 weeks, i can understand better the decision of 14 March people to niminate him, and all the events are showing why they have sone it.
In fact, we should realize that Lebanon is weak in Politics, and our leaders in March 14 cannot do whatever they want, for many reasons, among them:
1) they will need an international cover to go on with the 50+1, and till now they don’t have it.
2) there is no military balance in Lebanon, mainly with the arsenal of HA, so we’re not in a positin to take a risky step towards a civil war or anything near.
3) they did not receive any support from Bkerki for their action, so if we gonna blame them, we should blame our Patriarche in the first place, and i can’t imagine that.
Lat but not least, i hope, maybe i’m dreaming, but i hope that Michel Sleiman has changed somehow, maybe he has learned from what happened to Lahoud, and will be a good president after all, or else, may God help us.
20. Mourakib | December 19th, 2007 at 6:36 am

I have found a good opinion on a berutbeltway blog site:

” …More than three years ago, three men got together and decided it was time to end the Syrian occupation of Lebanon. Those three men were Walid Jumblatt, Rafik Hariri and Patriarch Sfeir. The world gave them a resolution but didn’t know how to implement it. We lost one of them to murder, and the other two are now living somewhere between fear and compromise. We are watching today the outcome of this abject international failure to stand up to thugs and criminals…”

accepting G. Suleiman is an indication of the weak position of M14 after nearly 2 years of the cedars revolution. this is a result of bad decisions (starting with the quartet alliance, to the election of house speaker, to the ceding the 1/3+1 rhetoric, to presneting MP Harb and exMP lahoud as candidates…) and weaker than anticipated international support.

another weakness of M14 is they always set targets they cannot achieve (outsed of pres. lahoud in 7 days, will never give up on MP harb or exMP lahoud as M14 candidates, will never accept new presidential term in void), eroding M14 support base and increasing confusion amoung sympatizers

may be M14 did not have the resources in the first place for a full victory but they need to learn how to better coordinate among each other and better communicate their strategies and their plans. othewise, they stand to loose a lot, with time..
21. marco K Montreal, Quebec | December 19th, 2007 at 7:29 am

please Y I heard that May chidiac and Sami Gemayel is a MUST SEE. try to upload it if u can! happy holidays
22. Ali1559 | December 19th, 2007 at 7:31 am

Sokhoushmoush

Ta7iyete la rab rabak , how you been doing ? waynak chaghaltile beleh ya zalame ? Kilo tamem ?
23. Ali1559 | December 19th, 2007 at 7:56 am

To my fellow lebanese lfers;

You are constantly placed in new sitautions with ppl from different backround (sunnis, druze ) . Each time you go to a new alliance , take a side, step to a new political level (since you are minority ) , you may need to alter your POLITICAL STRATEGY to cope effectively with the change . Some events ya AFANDE N 10452 are beyond you control , still you have to accept it or just leave it. You have to accept GMS for the sake of lebanon , you also have to agree that this is 2007 and things have changed. You guys need to become more politicalllllllly open minded. The old days have gone and no longer represent us. If you want the old days back then you dont belong in lebanon . I personally dont like GMS , but i have to give it up sometimes. Otherwise I sould be taking my skills elsewhere where I can find more flexible ppl who can agree on my VERY UNIQUE views.

Time for change ouwet …
24. Delta | December 19th, 2007 at 8:23 am

Dear N i appreciate the time that you put on this article u made great points specialy about sleimans hsitory and the assasination … bass ya sadiki ma il kil sakato … including our allies today bas that does it mean he has the right to not speack about it or condamnet it id ont know if i can use the word prevent it too anyway i give u that one..

but on the achrafiyeh incident i thought uve been unair a bit i blame what happened on saniouras goverment totaly from a to z and michel murr specialy and il sabe3 …

and teh football playing i 100% agree with you

thanks for ur reply most opart of ur argument were convincing i apprecite ur answer keep up the hard work
salem il massih
25. Delta | December 19th, 2007 at 8:24 am

sicario get out of here u scum mbag
26. Pierre Richa | December 19th, 2007 at 9:11 am

To that point you are fearing posting my reply!!!

“Your comment is awaiting moderation.”
27. marco K Montreal, Quebec | December 19th, 2007 at 9:56 am

N you are not saying anything new, michel sleiman is not a good guy at all, very ambiguous character w wossikh w fo2 el dakeh black sunday kamen! I think we should stop us, lebanese fighting when we know whos throwing the bomb!!! its sick whats happening, it really disgusts me from going back to lebanon
28. N10452 | December 19th, 2007 at 10:49 am

Pierre Richa,
Of course i am not fearing my friend, but all comments are put into moderation if they contain foul language thats all

I dont fear anything u say and i dont fear anything i say …. no limits to ur freedom of speech here .. unless when Bashir or the martyrs are insulted ..
29. Pierre Richa | December 19th, 2007 at 11:37 am

Bashir is insulted?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Where in all my posts did you read that!!!!!!!!!
Is this how you understood my Comment!!!!!!
For God Sake N!!!!
Read it Again!!!!!!
Definitly no one will insult Bashir especially from a person like me , whom cousin Died in his name one month prior to Bashir Deaths, when they tried to kill Bashir in Ain El Remmaneh!!!!!
You are accusing the WRONG PERSON!!!!!!!!!!
Read carefullt my post, and try to understand English!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
30. N10452 | December 19th, 2007 at 11:47 am

Ya Pierre ya 7abeebe,
I am saying everything is tolerated here except when Bash is insulted … loool

I wasnt referring to you .. am talking in general

Your comment was simply put under moderation cause it had some foul term i restrict ..

Mannak msa7sa7 mazbout el yom

Cheers mate
31. N10452 | December 19th, 2007 at 11:49 am

Foul language like ‘Ass Lickers’ if u see what i mean ..

Its just a way to prevent insults or spam languages from being posted …

Kattir khairak 3al bahdale chou badde 2ellak

You made my day haha
32. sicario | December 19th, 2007 at 2:57 pm

the problem of this blog is that each person that doesn’t have the same opinion is immediately taxed as ”Aounist” .. what i am saying is that Sleiman is a transition president … hoping that we will have a PRESIDENT next time ….

The person that made this article is to narrow minded don’t forget that ALL our allies were puppets of Rif Dimashk…that why i think this article is full of Cra..
33. Pierre Richa | December 19th, 2007 at 3:14 pm

Lah Lah Khaye N
Walla ma azde, it seems that it is a problem in the connection in my new country!!!
I didn’t got a refresh for the site where it was reposted my comment…

Again, man keep up the good work!!!

Cheers, currently am drinking my Vodca!!!
really it sucks, it seems a very bad brand, but the temperature outside is -7 -:)

caio
34. N10452 | December 19th, 2007 at 4:38 pm

Its ok Pierre ..
Cheers to you .. come to Lebanon and we ll make u taste the best Vodka
35. Condor | December 21st, 2007 at 10:49 pm

Suleiman is a “compromise” president and the only one that is somewhat accepted by all sides. The idea of his candidacy is to bridge the differences b/w all parties which is not very realistic but the best option available at this time, certainly better than 50+1 which would trigger a series of irreversible and damaging events to the country. The major obstacle is the syrians who are wary of Suleiman’s position on a lot of things and want guarantees for the opposition…which is why we still do not have a president.
36. Pr.Sleiman Profile at The&hellip | May 24th, 2008 at 4:03 pm

[...] Why i refuse Michel Suleiman .. [...]