I never opposed Christians reconciling with each others, and i would love to see all Christian parties reconciled and having put the past behind, but i am totally against the reconciliation with the Marada, its out of the question and unthinkable and i am positive it wont happen, because even if Geagea & Frangieh meet, that will only calm things for a bit and be more of a “cease fire” rather than a reconciliation.

Before people start accusing me of dividing the Christians, i will start defining what reconciliation is since politicians in Lebanon have their own definition of every term.

Reconciliation can be :
-An act of self-mortification or devotion performed voluntarily to show sorrow for a sin or other wrongdoing.
-A sacrament in some Christian churches that includes contrition, confession to a priest, acceptance of punishment, and absolution. Also called reconciliation.

Will Frangieh apologize for the family of Joud el Baye3 ? and all the civilians & unarmed militants his family killed ? Will he apologize for the killing of the Lfer in Batroun in the 2007 riots ? Will he apologize for the kiling of two Lfers in Dahr el Ein ?

And most importantly, Frangieh as a Christian, will he apologize to the Patriarch for disrespecting & insulting him??

Samir Geagea apologized publically and sincerely, and despite all the atrocities people accuse him of, his act must be appreciated and Hakim should materialize this apology ( discussed in another post), but who is this low-life Frangieh to bypass the Patriarch once again and ask for Aoun’s blessing to complete the reconciliation ?? What sort of joke is that ? Who is Aoun ?

And more importantly, why would you wanna reconcile with such a person ?

I say the LF should never accept his terms, and should force him to sign a reconciliation, or else portray him as the one not willing to sign one, and close the issue, because politically speaking, this reconciliation is no gonna change allies.




13 Comments. Add your own...

  • 1. Delta | October 7th, 2008 at 9:30 pm

    yes and no

  • 2. Fou2ad | October 7th, 2008 at 10:34 pm

    As usual you bash everyone who is against your hakim without thinking.
    You said: “Samir Geagea apologized publically and sincerely, and despite all the atrocities people accuse him of, his act must be appreciated and Hakim should materialize this apology”, by which you mean that geagea apolagized for the ehden massacre that he and his forces committed, and you argue that frangieh did not apolagize for the massacres(if you can call them massacres) he committed like geagea did, thus frangieh is against reconciliation, whereas geagea iis with. But wait, you said in a recent post that: “Public apology was excellent, and i’ve been calling for that a long time ago, apologizing for all those who committed atrocities as individuals in the name of the LF and pollute our image and disgraced our Cause in the past.” So geagea didn’t apolagize for what HE did, but for what some people in the LF that he didn’t know about did?

  • 3. danny | October 8th, 2008 at 12:00 am

    Please provide me with the definition of “reconciliation” in Lebanese dictionary before I can comment on it.
    I did not hear Nassy apologize for terrorizing and shutting down the country two years..I have not heard from the divine party any apologies for burning, killing and looting on May 7th…NO APOLOGIES YET from all. Except DSG. Yet they mock it. How stupid of a culture that mocks apologies and yet embraces child killers and mass murderers like Nassy! Remember most mass murders have been committed by invoking God’s name. From Christians to Moslims to pagans and atheists!

    Reconcile over what? What does it mean REALLY!

  • 4. Rima | October 8th, 2008 at 1:40 am

    What reconciliations will do us if our opponents, killers and assassins are still following the same political trend that favour the interets of foreign countries over their own country…it is nonsense!!!!!!

  • 5. Delta | October 8th, 2008 at 1:49 am

    danny thank you for what you said but i think talks between partys is important and could avoid us trouble

  • 6. Michele | October 8th, 2008 at 7:25 am

    And i would like to add to Danny’s comment, did Aoun apologize to all the Lebanese when he took us all to an unprepared war n deserted his men, family n lebanese like a dirty rat??

    I can’t remember him once showing any remorse regrets… N yet u still find idiot Lebanese like Foufou who think of him as a hero!!!!

  • 7. Rodge | October 8th, 2008 at 10:30 am

    N,

    I agree on every word you wrote in the post.
    It is true that all the reconciliations, whether between Geagea and Frangieh, or elsewhere the one involving Jumblatt - Hariri - Nasrallah, are similar to a cease fire that won’t last.
    What we really need is not the reconciliation between political figures, instead between ordinary Lebanese, between the followers of those leaders.
    The problem is that leaders can always meet and trade hugs and kisses and salutes (and they are doing that), but their followers paid and they are still paying the price, also they will pay in the future if things are not done correctly.
    What we need for an exmaple is a reconciliation inside the heart of Pierre Ishaac’s family, a reconciliation and peace for the families of the victims of all the acts and accidents occured in many Lebanese areas, from Daher el Ain, to Batroun, to Bsarma, Zahle, Beirut, Shouf and other areas, and that could only start by surrending the killers who are well known in many of these accidents.

  • 8. paul | October 8th, 2008 at 11:51 am

    reconciliation means, forgiveness, mercy, coexistence, remorse, tolerance, acceptance and love.but it seems like if le petit sleiman have no courage to start a new era.

  • 9. Rima | October 8th, 2008 at 12:59 pm

    Ya 3ami what era is le petit Suleiman is going to start…ma nousso or 2/3 bi souriya wil ba2i bi Iran.Leich houwe lebneini asslan?

  • 10. paul | October 8th, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    Rima,akid 3indo asbeb ta ykoun bsourya.
    i mean era ijtime3iye.

  • 11. Rima | October 8th, 2008 at 2:06 pm

    A country more than half of its MPs are traitors is just mazra3a

  • 12. Delta | October 8th, 2008 at 7:51 pm

    the election of le petit sleiman is to be blamed on samir geagea and precisely 14 of march no one else

  • 13. JOEY ZAZA | October 8th, 2008 at 7:59 pm

    we need to be unified as i operating system and if it takes reconsideing then let it be and may the dead rest in peace because there death is a reson to reconsideing…



Leave a Reply


Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed







Recent Comments