Lately, this topic has been the subject of every major or minor political debate and discussion… change the government…down with Sanioura’s govt…etc…
Suddenly, everyone forgot the efforts put up by PM Sanioura during the 34 days of the Israeli onslaught on Lebanon…everyone forgot the important role he played in the making of resolution 1701…everyone forgot the stress and the hardships the man successfully went through to see a cease to the hostilities brought through…the question that comes to mind is WHY???
The way I, and many fellow Lebanese see it, is that the demand for a govt overthrow is an offensive defense… i.e., HA knows that it is cornered, and must submit its weapons sooner or later…having learned from the lessons of the past (I’m sure HN is very weary of the LF experience from the time they unconditionally handed in their weapons until 2005 and is not willing to repeat the same mistakes), HA wants to raise the stakes at the negotiations table as much as possible in order to sell their weapons for the highest political price attainable… so it is all a question of time…
Going to the street, IMO, is not a viable solution because despite all that is said, this would be a replay of 8th march/14th march 2005…HA knows better than to play the numbers game this time…
This would leave them with the other choice, and that is to withdraw their ministers from the govt…here again, I doubt they will venture into such a thing…as for going the long way by having their MPs resign, and forcing a new election, I believe it would take too long a time for it to achieve the desired results…
My first question to those that are calling for a change in govt: who do you have in mind to form the new govt?
- Saad el Hariri? IMO, and with all due respect, he is not PM material…neither his age, nor his political expertise warrant the post…
- Siniora? what the heck…he is already there…what are they trying to do?
- Karami? Well…twice he was selected as PM and twice he was overthrown by public protests…care to go for a 3rd???
- Mr. X? what is his agenda? What are his positions towards Syria? I’m guessing that HA’s definition of “national unity” is “anyone who is pro HA” … from what we have seen lately, that includes a whole bunch of ex Syrian henchmen and cronies…are we in front of another attempt to reintroduce Syria??????? I mean just like they have a right to question the “patriotism” of anyone, we, the remainder of the Lebanese people, have the same right…after all, Lebanon is still our land…
My second question is what does HA want from the new “bayen wizari” or governmental agenda?
- Recognition of its right to bear arms? once the Shebaa farms issue is settled, this right will exist no longer…
- vetoing power? that would be contrary to any democratic concept…and frankly speaking, a vetoing power in the hands of the likes of HA and aoun is indeed a scary thought, especially after all we have seen in the last two months in terms of political agendas…
- including major powers in the govt? IMO this is an empty one…in any democracy, parties participate in govts through coalitions with other parties…moreover, what is, in HA’s dictionary, the definition of “major party”? I’m betting they mean the FPM…hey doesn’t the famous “memorandum of understanding” constitute such a coalition? or are there hidden factors no one is aware of?? as for the other political figures, I doubt they deserve to be called a party, well, at best they are a bunch of has-beens who want a spot in the limelight and are ready to do whatever it takes…
My third question is what can be achieved with Lahoud still in power??? basing my analysis on his performance in the last year, as well as his unhidden bias for Syria, he would use delaying tactics to negatively affect the timely formation of the new govt…
This would mean constitutional vacuum, and of course could lead to, among many other problems, a cancellation of the international court…a purely Syrian demand…everyone remembers how HA deputies boycotted all cabinet meetings with the aim of sabotaging the international court project.
Is this another attempt to do so? are we today catering for requests of Bachar in his last speech???
I mean it is clear that the only beneficiary of this cancellation would be Syria and anyone involved in the assassination…
I, as many, have a lot to reproach to this govt…it may not be the best we have, and it certainly committed a lot of mistakes in its lifetime, but overthrowing it now would be a grave tactical mistake…
IMO, the change should start at the top of the pyramid…change the president…it is high time that Lahoud goes…then, with a LEBANESE president, one with only LEBANON’s interests at heart, can we embark in the rest of the journey…changes would include everything from the weapons of HA to main political figures today on the scenes…
As the saying goes, if you want to do it, do it right, or don’t…


